Pages

Showing posts with label canadian politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label canadian politics. Show all posts

December 10, 2008

Caption Contest Results

Remember that caption contest I announced at the beginning of the month? The one where you submitted your captions for this picture from the CBC website?


The one I was supposed to judge last Sunday? Well, judging these things are harder than I thought. I got some good chuckles from some of the entries, but in the end I could only pick one.   I'm pleased to announce that the winner is Nemmy! 

Nemmy's caption was:
Gilles: Um... Jack... You still owe me five bucks.

The Movement for Independents

Yesterday, I was interviewed about the case for applying Consensus Government to Canada's Parliament. That interview aired dark and early this morning (at least, it was dark and early in the Yukon when it aired) on CBC's NWT morning radio show, The Trailbreaker. Here it is:



Then, UpHere Magazine asked if I would write something for their blog. I ended up writing an entry that would later be called "A room full of monkeys, or, why Ottawa should adopt Northern consensus-style government". (Not my original title, but it works.)

In truth, making the case for Consensus Government it pretty easy. Clare, over at the House and other Arctic Musings summed it up quite eloquently on his blog.

I'm quickly coming to realize that we're not "voices in the wilderness" on this issue. Canadians across the country are getting sick and tired of party politics and are excited to hear that there is a better approach - one that is more representative of Canadians.

In its few days of existence, the Canadians for Consensus Government facebook group has grown quickly - and with consistently more than four times as many outstanding invitations as there are members, it's sure to keep growing. The discussions have been good and constructive. Check them out for yourself!

One of the questions that keeps coming up is "How do we make this happen?" Three actions that we can all take really stick out in my mind:
  1. Learn more about the pros and cons of the Consensus Model, then tell your friends and family and the media about it.
  2. Ask your MP who they're there for - their constituents or their party. Then, assuming your MP hasn't said they're there for the party, ask them to represent their constituents better by becoming an Independent. Who knows, if a few good MPs go this route, we might see the start of a movement at the MP level. Wishful thinking, perhaps, but it's better than doing nothing.
  3. Don't vote for a party. Instead, vote for an Independent who you think will do a good job representing your riding.
The "Movement for Independents" is on the rise.

December 04, 2008

Jumping on the bandwagon...

I know I'm not the only getting endless invitations to join Facebook groups that support the Conservatives or the coalition. And I am really not looking forward to another month or two of rhetoric as the parties try to sway or solicit my opinion about who I think is right - because I think they're all wrong. Partisan politics are coming before the needs of Canadians and I, for one, am sick of it.

I have, in the end, decided to join a Facebook group. It's not the one that supports the Conservatives. It's not the one that supports the coalition. It's the one that supports a government that best represents the people of Canada. You can find it here.

December 03, 2008

Voices in the wilderness...

Looks like I'm not the only one who's ready for a consensus-style system of government at the national level...

Read Clare's take at The House & other Arctic Musings. Check out his riveting "True Crime" entries while you're at it!

December 02, 2008

There are better ways...

As fascinating as the drama on Parliament Hill is to watch, I can't help but think that it's like watching yourself step on a nail - it's certainly interesting, but it's not very pleasant and can only lead to more pain and suffering later on. You can be upset with the foot or you can be upset with the nail (you can also cheer for either one), but the end result is the same: an injured, bloody foot and a discarded or bent nail.

I have no doubt that the whole election/coalition/proroguing issue will lead to discussions in the media about parliamentary reform, so I'm going to throw my two-cents out while I have a chance.

Canadians should seriously consider adopting the consensus-style system of government. Both the Northwest Territories and Nunavut use consensus governments. If you don't know how the consensus system works, read about how it's applied in Nunavut in this Canadian Parliamentary Review article. (Thanks to Way Way Up for the link.)

Critics of the consensus-style system say it may work for small territories but that it can't work for a country with over three hundred Members of Parliament. Well, how well is the party-based system working now? You might try to argue that this is a perfect example of how well the party system works, but I ask you, is what we're seeing an example of the parties looking out for the best interests of Canadians?  Or are the parties only looking out for themselves?

The current system is based on party survival.  Because of that, I know that the consensus system will never be adopted at the national level.  After all, the people who would need to adopt the changes are the ones with the most to lose.  Still, with everything that's going on, you can't fault a guy for doing a little wishful thinking...



Caption Contest


CBC has used this picture for several of their articles on the Conservative/Coalition showdown. Like any good picture, this one is worth at least a thousand words and I'd like to hear some of yours.  Therefore, I hereby announce the first ever Michael's Meanderings Caption Contest!

Submit your entry in the comments section, below.  Judging will begin on Sunday.

The Schoolyard Players

ACT I: Scene I

(Scene:  The school yard, before classes start.)
Steve: I'm the king of the castle! You're the dirty rascals! Hey, Steffie! Nobody likes you, you big wimp!
Jack: Why do you take that from him, Steph? Why do you let him make fun of you like that?
Steph: Ah, what am I to do? I don't want to be like him. I think he feels threatened by me, for some reason.
Jack: He picks on you because you let him. You need to stand up for yourself.
Gilles: You're all a bunch of losers.

(Scene:  Gym class.)
Steve: Give me those basket balls, wimps. Ha ha! Now I'm the king of the court!
Jack and Steph and Gilles: Hey! Give those back! You already have a bunch of basket balls. Why do you need ours?
Steve: What are you going to do, Steffie? Huh? Huh? What are you going to do? Go cry to your mummy? Nerd!
Steph: I'll... I'll show you!
Jack: You need a hand with this guy, Steph?
Steph: Ok!
Gilles: Hey, guys! if it will get me more basket balls, I'll be happy to lend you a hand!
Steve: Woah, hold on there, guys! Three against one? That's not fair!
Steph: We've... we've had enough of you picking on everybody!
Jack: Yeah!
Gilles: Sure, why not!
Steve: Here! Here! Here are your basket balls!
Steph: Too late, you... you big bully.
Steve: Teacher! Teacher! They're trying to beat me up! Tell them to leave me alone! End class early!
Steph and Jack: Yeah! Teacher! Teacher! Come here teacher!
Mrs. Jean (talking with another teacher): I'll be right there, children... They never change, do they?
Steve: You think you can beat me, you little runts? Come on! I dare you!

To be continued...


October 14, 2008

Post-election hangover.

I'm in Yellowknife right now, watching the post-election analysis in my hotel room.

While I enjoyed the political debate (when it was actually debate and not smearing or propaganda), am I the only person who thinks that a whole lot of taxpayer money was just blown on a senseless election?